<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kansas Divorce Source &#187; Property Division</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/category/property-division/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:15:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Your upside down real estate and Kansas Divorce</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/your-upside-down-real-estate-and-kansas-divorce</link>
		<comments>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/your-upside-down-real-estate-and-kansas-divorce#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shea Stevens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Property Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[martial home]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/?p=617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have discussed what to do with your house on several posts, however, I realize  I haven&#8217;t really touched on what you should do with your house in your divorce if your house is upside-down (you own more on your house than its worth).  While there is no great solution to this issue, you should [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have discussed what to do with your house on several posts, however, I realize  I haven&#8217;t really touched on what you should do with your house in your divorce if your house is upside-down (you own more on your house than its worth).  While there is no great solution to this issue, you should certainly weigh your options very carefully if you are faced with this scenario.</p>
<p>1. Continue to live together until one of you can refinance or the home sells.</p>
<p>2. One person continues to live in the home but both parties split the bills.  This situation would only work if you or your spouse has a friend or family member willing to let him/her rent for free.</p>
<p>3.  Negotiate a short sale. A short sale is when you get the permission of your mortgage lender to sell the house for less than what you owe on the mortgage and hopefully, you negotiate that you won’t have to make up the difference.  Most lenders will not extend the option for a short sale unless if you’re behind on your mortgage payments by several months.</p>
<p>4. Walk away from the home.  Let it go into foreclosure.  While this is generally not recommended, I would prefer to see clients cut their losses before sinking every penny (including cashing out retirement assets) to pay for a losing asset.</p>
<p>5. Negotiate a loan modification.  This may be a good option if you and your spouse do not want to enter foreclosure, however, you cannot afford the payments.  If you can renegotiate your mortgage terms, you may be able to sell the home to break even, rent the home, or one party may be able to live in the home.</p>
<p>What you need to remember is that with all of the above options, if both parties are on the loan, then BOTH parties still remain liable until you sell the home or refinance yourself. It is important to make these decisions jointly with your spouse as you still remain legally tied to this home, regardless if your marriage has been dissolved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/your-upside-down-real-estate-and-kansas-divorce/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Custody of the family pet in your Kansas divorce</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/custody-of-the-family-pet-in-your-kansas-divorce</link>
		<comments>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/custody-of-the-family-pet-in-your-kansas-divorce#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shea Stevens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Property Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custody of animal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family pet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas divorce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/?p=581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During a divorce consultation, I am often asked about the family pet(s).  How does the court deal with pets? Do we set up a parenting arrangement?  To date, the Kansas courts have not dealt with the pet as they do with children; the pet is viewed as property, which means that one party gets possession [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During a divorce consultation, I am often asked about the family pet(s).  How does the court deal with pets? Do we set up a parenting arrangement?  To date, the Kansas courts have not dealt with the pet as they do with children; the pet is viewed as property, which means that one party gets possession of the pet and if required, the courts value the pet when dividing the property.   The courts do not determine a custody arrangement or parenting schedule, simply, one party gets possession of the animal.  I recently came across a <a href="http://www.myfoxphilly.com/dpp/good_day_philadelphia/081109_Couple_Spends_40K_On_Dog_Custody">New Jersey</a> case where the courts are viewing the issue of the family pet differently, and the couple has spent approximately $40K in legal fees to determine the custody of the animal.  I do not see the the Kansas courts changing their view on family pets, however, it seems this is an issue that may be very interesting to follow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/custody-of-the-family-pet-in-your-kansas-divorce/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Refinancing your house in your Kansas divorce</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/refinancing-your-house-in-your-kansas-divorce</link>
		<comments>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/refinancing-your-house-in-your-kansas-divorce#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shea Stevens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Property Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refinance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/?p=574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have authored several posts regarding the marital home, however, I thought it was worth it to caution certain parties from keeping the home if you cannot refinance the home in your own name.  There are several horror stories out there, but this one is just an example of what could happen if you keep [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have authored several posts regarding the marital home, however, I thought it was worth it to caution certain parties from keeping the home if you cannot refinance the home in your own name.  There are several horror stories out there, but this one is just an example of what could happen if you keep both parties&#8217; names on this martial asset after your divorce.  Please note, the wife in this story does have some legal recourse against her ex-husband for fraud, however, if she will ever see repayment on what he owes her is highly unlikely.</p>
<p>This article was posted on Examiner.com on 7/31/09, written by Thomas Pierce:</p>
<h1>Divorce and the marital home; a cautionary tale</h1>
<p>(exerpt, full article can be found <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-18108-Boston-Mortgage-Industry-Examiner~y2009m7d31-Divorce-and-the-marital-home-a-cautionary-tale">here</a>)</p>
<p>Her plan was to refinance her current mortgage, payoff the ex husband, and take some cash for some home repairs. She discussed this with her ex husband and he appeared to be on board.</p>
<p>In discussing her current mortgage she mentioned that she and her ex husband had taken out a home equity line prior to the divorce becoming final. The purpose of the line, she told me, was to have money available in case the house required any major repairs or if they needed money to fund their children’s college education. As loan to value was tight and because many homeowners do not consider a home equity line a mortgage (they are indeed mortgages), I breathed deeply and asked her “have you ever taken out any money on line?” She told me that while her ex husband had approached her last fall about accessing the home equity line, she refused his request, and that the line had a zero balance. Relieved, I advised her to proceed with the refinance.</p>
<p>My friend dutifully gathered her paperwork and forwarded them to the broker. About two hours after the broker had her paperwork I got a phone call from the processor who was working the loan. He told me that not only did the home equity line have a balance it was maxed out and was two months late. It fell to me to deliver the bad news. Needless to say my friend had a very bad day that day.</p>
<p>Now instead of having sole ownership of the house for only an additional $100.00 a month and some cash to tackle some home improvement projects with she now is faced with legal costs and the prospect of having to pay an additional $300.00 a month on a home equity line from which she derived no benefit as the ex husband is broke. As for the ex husband, who used the home equity line to pay down $70,000 in credit card debt, he could face criminal charges and faces the very real prospect of having to pay alimony for the rest of my friend’s life. As I have second hand familiarity with the attorney representing my friend I would say that the ex husband’s troubles are only beginning.</p>
<p>The lesson here is that divorced couples need to separate their financial lives from the ex spouses as much as possible. While arrangements such as mine and my friend’s are common, leaving loose ends such as an open home equity line available to both parties is just a recipe for trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/refinancing-your-house-in-your-kansas-divorce/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Determining Assets During Your Kansas Divorce</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/determining-assets-during-your-kansas-divorce</link>
		<comments>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/determining-assets-during-your-kansas-divorce#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shea Stevens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Property Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas divorce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/?p=556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Generally, both parties are aware of the financial standings of the family.   However, there are still many living situations where only one party is privy to the financial information of the family.  If you are going through a divorce and have not recently been involved in paying bills, opening/reviewing mail, preparing taxes, balancing your bank [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally, both parties are aware of the financial standings of the family.   However, there are still many living situations where only one party is privy to the financial information of the family.  If you are going through a divorce and have not recently been involved in paying bills, opening/reviewing mail, preparing taxes, balancing your bank account or you do not have access to any accounts, you need to notify your attorney immediately.  This situation can be very dangerous as you may think you are financially stable, however, due to your spouse&#8217;s mismanagement or misrepresentation, your family has a great deal of debt.   The opposite may be true as well.  You may think that your family is living paycheck to paycheck, however, in reality your spouse has been hiding assets from you.</p>
<p>There are several avenues to obtain this information. One way is through informal or formal discovery.  This is the path that attorney&#8217;s take to request information from the other party and then the other party provides the information or objects to the request.  This can be a lengthy process and if you ultimately feel that your spouse is still hiding something after producing the documents that you requested, you may want to go a more aggressive route.  You may want to hire an investigator, more specifically, a forensic accountant.   The advice of a forensic accountant can be invaluable, helping to ensure that the divorce settlement is based upon full disclosure of information.</p>
<p><strong></strong>Simply put, forensic accountants analyze money.  By sifting through complex financial documents, forensic accountants develop an accurate assessment of the relevant financial situation. When forensic accountants become involved in family law disputes, they evaluate when money is coming into the family, where assets are stored, and how assets are being distributed.    Property division can only be fair with a full understanding of the marital assets. If both spouses have not been actively involved in the management of family finances, one might not be aware of all investments.   If one spouse is attempting to conceal assets, it may be nearly impossible for an untrained person to them.  A forensic accountant can investigate and review finances to determine whether there are hidden assets and to ensure that the property division accounts for all martial assets.</p>
<p><strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/determining-assets-during-your-kansas-divorce/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Determining the Value of Your Home During Your Kansas Divorce</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/determining-the-value-of-your-home-during-your-kansas-divorce</link>
		<comments>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/determining-the-value-of-your-home-during-your-kansas-divorce#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shea Stevens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Property Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital residence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/?p=541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In order to determine the value of your real estate (non-commercial property owned by the parties) you must determine what is the net equity of the home.  The net equity is the only item of value, or simply put, the asset to be divided by the court.
In order to do this you must first determine [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order to determine the value of your real estate (non-commercial property owned by the parties) you must determine what is the net equity of the home.  The net equity is the only item of value, or simply put, the asset to be divided by the court.</p>
<p>In order to do this you must first determine the fair market value.  The fair market value (FMV) is either agreed to by the parties, determined by an individual appraisal, the tax appraisal, or a realtor.  The fair market value is then reduced by the remaining amount of mortgage balance(s) on the property and by the costs of sale.</p>
<p>Generally, Judges use an 8% cost of sale (7% commission + 1% closing costs).  Some may not agree with the value of the home being assessed the cost of sale if one party does not intend to sell the home, however, the courts rationale is that the house will likely be sold at some point, and those costs will ultimately have to be paid and reduce the value of the property to the recipient.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">VALUE OF REAL ESTATE SIMPLE EQUATION</span></p>
<p>FMV &#8211; (MORTGAGE BALANCE + 8% COST OF SALE)= NET EQUITY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/determining-the-value-of-your-home-during-your-kansas-divorce/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kansas Prenuptial Agreements: Does Yours Need Revised?</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/kansas-prenuptial-agreements-does-yours-need-revised</link>
		<comments>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/kansas-prenuptial-agreements-does-yours-need-revised#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 14:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shea Stevens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Property Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kansas prenuptial agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revision of prenuptial agreement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/?p=532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a very interesting article posted on the Wall Street Journal.  It may certainly be worth taking the time to revisit the agreement you and your spouse originally negotiated during this time of economic downturn.
Here is a link to the full article.
Why Your Prenup May Need a Check-Up: By Melissa Korn (WSJ Blogs)
Lawyers used [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a very interesting article posted on the Wall Street Journal.  It may certainly be worth taking the time to revisit the agreement you and your spouse originally negotiated during this time of economic downturn.</p>
<p>Here is a <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/wallet/2009/06/29/why-your-pre-nup-may-need-a-check-up/">link </a>to the full article.</p>
<h3 class="byline">Why Your Prenup May Need a Check-Up: By Melissa Korn (WSJ Blogs)</h3>
<p class="byline">Lawyers used to tell clients to put their prenuptial agreemeents in a locked drawer and keep them there unless the marriage goes south.</p>
<p>These days, however, some are recommending a second look at those documents, no matter how stable your relationship may be.</p>
<p>As asset values plummeted over the past year, your net worth probably did, too. And don’t think you have to be a gazillionaire to need a pre-nup, anyway. Any couple who saw the value of their house or vacation home skyrocket then plummet over the past decade or a couple with substantial individual savings or investment assets could be due for a review.</p>
<p>So if you were once valued at $1 million in real estate and other assets, you could now be down to $500,000. If your pre-nup said you would fork over $300,000 (rather than 30% of your assets) in the case of divorce, you’d still be on the hook for that amount. Thirty percent might be manageable; $300,000, a lot less so, especially if you worked on Wall Street and are now sitting on the couch</p>
<p>Ivan Tabek, a partner in the personal-planning practice at<span style="color: #000000;"> Proskauer Rose LLP</span>, warns that many pre-nuptial agreements (and post-nuptials, for that matter) could be “woefully out of date.” He recommends reviewing all the numbers in a document to see if they’re still relevant and, if not, updating them. He notes that pre-nuptial agreements usually take into account projected asset value and income, which may need to be re-checked as people scale back investment expectations and lose their jobs.</p>
<p>From a legal standpoint, changing a pre-nup is fairly simple, Mr. Taback says. The awkwardness comes in because a couple must acknowledge a potential split. He says spouses should have separate legal counsel, since their interests are different.</p>
<p>Renegotiating can get messy when the less-affluent spouse is unwilling to give up what he or she believes is rightfully theirs, even if the money isn’t there anymore. Lawyers, property appraisals and bank statements come in handy here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/kansas-prenuptial-agreements-does-yours-need-revised/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joint Credit Card Debts and Your Kansas Divorce</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/joint-credit-card-debts-and-your-kansas-divorce</link>
		<comments>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/joint-credit-card-debts-and-your-kansas-divorce#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shea Stevens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Property Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kansas debt division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas divorce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/?p=523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Division of credit card debts is a very complicated issue in a divorce today.   The debt that is most problematic is joint credit card debt.   Many people believe that if one party agreed to take on joint credit card debt as part of the divorce settlement, then that party is solely responsible for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Division of credit card debts is a very complicated issue in a divorce today.   The debt that is most problematic is joint credit card debt.   Many people believe that if one party agreed to take on joint credit card debt as part of the divorce settlement, then that party is solely responsible for the debt.  This is not true.  Even if you agree in your divorce settlement to take on a specific amount of the debt, if you and your spouse are jointly on the account, the credit card company still sees the debt as the legal obligation of both parties.   The credit card company does not care about the agreements made in divorce court, they only care that you jointly applied for an account and you are jointly responsible on the account regardless of your marital status.  So, if your ex spouse does not make the payments, the credit card company will look to you, the joint creditor to pay the debt.</p>
<p>The remedy you have against your spouse in this situation is to go back to court to enforce the divorce decree or settlement agreement.  However, you are still obligated in the meantime to pay the credit card company, or the debt may be turned over to collections and negatively affect your credit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/joint-credit-card-debts-and-your-kansas-divorce/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debt incurred after filing for divorce in Kansas</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/debt-incurred-after-filing-for-divorce-in-kansas</link>
		<comments>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/debt-incurred-after-filing-for-divorce-in-kansas#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shea Stevens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Property Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kansas property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/?p=520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is a common fear among divorcing couples that the other spouse is going to destroy the couple financially after the divorce is filed.  While this is a very real and valid fear, debt incurred after filing is commonly presumed the debt of the person who incurred said debt and should be paid by the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a common fear among divorcing couples that the other spouse is going to destroy the couple financially after the divorce is filed.  While this is a very real and valid fear, debt incurred after filing is commonly presumed the debt of the person who incurred said debt and should be paid by the party incurring the debt.   Parties are generally expected to pay their own normal living expenses during the divorce period.</p>
<p>If the court determines that the debt was necessary, such as to pay ordinary living expenses, then the court will evaluate several factors with respect to the situation of the parties, for example, if temporary maintenance was received, if one spouse refused to work, if one spouse had to work two jobs to support the other spouse, etc.  and will divide the debt equitably based upon relevant factors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/debt-incurred-after-filing-for-divorce-in-kansas/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is Non-Marital or Separate Property in Kansas?</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/what-is-non-marital-or-separate-property-in-kansas</link>
		<comments>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/what-is-non-marital-or-separate-property-in-kansas#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shea Stevens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Property Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kansas non-martial property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kansas separate property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/?p=514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Under Kansas Law, there is not a definition of non-martial or separate property.  As discussed previously, Kansas is an equitable property state.  What this means is that at the time of the divorce, all of the property of the parties, including separately titled property, becomes marital property.  However, in dividing the property, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under Kansas Law, there is not a definition of non-martial or separate property.  As discussed previously, Kansas is an equitable property state.  What this means is that at the time of the divorce, all of the property of the parties, including separately titled property, becomes marital property.  However, in dividing the property, the court can, by its equitable powers, account for premarital property, extra contributions and gifts/inheritance in determining an unequal award of property.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jocobar.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=7">The Johnson County Family Law Bench/Bar Guidelines</a> suggest that &#8220;Individual Property&#8221; is defined as follows:</p>
<ol>
<li>the entry value of property owned prior to the marriage, and brought into the marriage</li>
<li>entry value of property received during the marriage by will or inheritance</li>
<li>entry value of property received during the marriage b a gift from someone other than the spouse or children of the parties.</li>
</ol>
<p>As a general rule, the individual property will not be divided between the parties, but restored to the party by whom it was acquired.   The individual property is restored at its entry value at the time the parties were married or at the time the asset came into the marriage.   When individual assets are sold and proceeds are used for the purchase of other assets then, the recently purchased assets is individual to the extent of the value of the individual asset used to purchase the new asset.  However, when individual assets are liquidated and the proceeds used for basic living expenses, and are not traceable to the purchase of a new assets, this money is no longer an individual asset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/what-is-non-marital-or-separate-property-in-kansas/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Six things to think about before signing a Kansas Prenuptial Agreement</title>
		<link>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/six-things-to-think-about-before-signing-a-kansas-prenuptial-agreement</link>
		<comments>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/six-things-to-think-about-before-signing-a-kansas-prenuptial-agreement#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shea Stevens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Property Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kansas prenuptial agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prenup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prenuptial agreement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/?p=497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently read an article that listed six things to think about prior to signing a prenup.  These questions often come up in the context when I am drafting an agreement, and it is best to be fully informed of the pros and cons prior to entering into an agreement.   Please click here for the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently read an article that listed six things to think about prior to signing a prenup.  These questions often come up in the context when I am drafting an agreement, and it is best to be fully informed of the pros and cons prior to entering into an agreement.   Please click <a href="http://www.fosters.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090608/GJLIFESTYLES/906049919/-1/FOSLIFESTYLES">here</a> for the full article by Candace Choi.   Shea Stevens comments are <span style="text-decoration: underline;">underlined.</span></p>
<p>1. IS IT RIGHT FOR ME?</p>
<p>Prenups aren&#8217;t just for the fabulously rich. They can play a pivotal role in protecting people at all income levels.</p>
<p>One of the more common reasons to get a prenup is to protect the interests of children from a prior marriage. A sizable portion of assets automatically go to a spouse upon death in most states, but this can be avoided by using a prenup. Unlike wills, a prenup requires your partner to sign off on giving up those rights.</p>
<p>Another scenario when a prenup makes sense is when there&#8217;s a significant disparity in wealth. It&#8217;s also worth considering if you or your spouse-to-be owns a small business or a stake in a family business; a prenup can ensure ownership isn&#8217;t contested in a divorce.</p>
<p>Not everyone needs a prenup, of course.</p>
<p>&#8220;When a couple is starting from scratch and there are less assets brought in, there&#8217;s not as big a need,&#8221; said Greg Womack, a certified financial planner and president of Womack Investment Advisers in Edmond, Okla.</p>
<p>2. HOW MUCH WILL IT COST?</p>
<p>Getting a prenup won&#8217;t be cheap.</p>
<p>Even for a couple with modest assets, the cost could total a couple thousand dollars. An attorney might charge about $1,500 to draw up the document, either for a flat fee or at an hourly rate. Your partner would also want a separate attorney to avoid a conflict of interests.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Law Office of Shea Stevens generally prepares these agreements for less than $1,000.  However, the total cost is generallya bit more since it is highly recommended for both parties to have separate attorneys.</span></p>
<p>&#8220;You&#8217;re about to waive away certain rights,&#8221; said Nickelson of the American Academy of Matriomonial Lawyers. &#8220;I think a lawyer is absolutely necessary for both parties.&#8221;</p>
<p>Each side might also want to tweak the agreement before signing it. Prenups for larger, more complicated estates can cost as much as $10,000, if not more.</p>
<p>Couples can also draw up a do-it-yourself prenup. But state laws regarding marital property can be complex, and an attorney can ensure the prenup covers all your bases.</p>
<p>3. WHAT SHOULD IT COVER?</p>
<p>The main purpose of a premarital agreement is sort out who owns what in the event of a divorce.</p>
<p>Typically, any debt someone has when they get married — such as a student loan — will follow them in a divorce. But even a spouse isn&#8217;t directly liable for their partner&#8217;s prior debt, creditors might be able to go after shared property such as cars or vacation homes.</p>
<p>A prenup can specify what property or debt will be shared in a marriage. For instance, you might own a home that you want to remain under your name alone in the event of a divorce. Or you and your partner might agree to commingle all assets each brings into the marriage, as well as those earned in the future.</p>
<p>You can spell out how alimony will be handled, too.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Kansas uses the term maintenance, not alimony.  The prenup can specify if you plan on waiving your right to maintenance, or set the amount of maintenance, for instance, if you are married you will get X amount for X months. </span></p>
<p>4. IS THERE ANYTHING A PRENUP CAN&#8217;T COVER?</p>
<p>Forget about striking a deal on who gets custody of the kids in a prenup.</p>
<p>&#8220;You can&#8217;t just waive away the rights of children,&#8221; said Mitchell Karpf, incoming chair of the family law section of the American Bar Association. Essentially, a prenup can&#8217;t trump public policy.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">You cannot waive child support in a prenuptial agreement either.  The Kansas courts retain jurisdiction over the children until they are 18 years of age.</span></p>
<p>You could, however, spell out how a child is raised, including the religion that should be observed.</p>
<p>Another taboo subject heading into a lifelong partnership is infidelity. This could be the only topic even more squirm inducing than money.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not uncommon to hear of high-profile prenups that include stipulations that void a spouse&#8217;s alimony rights if caught cheating.</p>
<p>While there&#8217;s no reason your prenup can&#8217;t include a similar clause, Karpf cautions that they can be messy and protract legal proceedings.</p>
<p>&#8220;The problem is, how do you prove it?&#8221; Karpf said.</p>
<p>Most states also have laws dictating that prenups need to be generally fair and reasonable. That means a prenup that gives everything to one party might not hold up.</p>
<p>5. IS A PRENUP EASY TO INVALIDATE?</p>
<p>It seems the only time a prenup makes news is when it&#8217;s contested, which may give the impression that they&#8217;re easy to overturn.</p>
<p>That shouldn&#8217;t be the case if properly executed.</p>
<p>The first step is to allow ample time to think over the terms. Getting a prenup shoved at you on your wedding day could later give you ground to claim it was signed under duress.</p>
<p>There also needs to be reasonable disclosure. So if you&#8217;ve kept quiet about a $100,000 savings account, start talking.</p>
<p>6. HOW OFTEN SHOULD A PRENUP BE UPDATED?</p>
<p>As with any legal document, it&#8217;s a good idea to update your prenup whenever there&#8217;s a significant change in your circumstances.</p>
<p>This might include the birth of a child, an inheritance or a career change. Such life-altering events might be grounds for invalidating certain financial agreements made in a prenup.</p>
<p>&#8220;Prenups can become outdated,&#8221; said Womack. &#8220;The court might decide the document is no longer appropriate under changed circumstances.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kansasdivorcesource.com/property-division/six-things-to-think-about-before-signing-a-kansas-prenuptial-agreement/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
